Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0360220190600090835
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
2019 Volume.60 No. 9 p.835 ~ p.842
Clinical Outcomes of Patients Implanted with Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses
Park Su-Hwan

Kim Sung-Il
Ahn Jung-Hyo
Shin Jong-Hoon
Kim Su-Jin
Lee Ji-Eun
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the postoperative clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs.

Methods: A total of 60 patients were divided into three groups, and each group included 20 patients of 40 eyes: group A with a +3.25 D bifocal IOL in both eyes, group B with an EDOF IOL in both eyes, and group C with a +3.25 D bifocal in one eye and an EDOF IOL in the other eye. We retrospectively reviewed the patients¡¯ medical charts to analyze their binocular uncorrected visual acuities (UCVAs; distant, intermediate, and near) and refraction at postoperative 3 months.

Results: The binocular distant UCVAs were 0.04 ¡¾ 0.01, 0.05 ¡¾ 0.02, and 0.04 ¡¾ 0.01 in groups A, B, and C, respectively, and there were no differences between the groups (p > 0.05). The intermediate UCVAs were 0.16 ¡¾ 0.01, 0.10 ¡¾ 0.01, and 0.10 ¡¾ 0.01, respectively, and group A was the lowest (A?B, p = 0.031; A?C, p = 0.018; B?C, p = 1.000). The near UCVAs were 0.05 ¡¾ 0.01, 0.24 ¡¾ 0.01, and 0.13 ¡¾ 0.01, respectively, and there were significant differences between the groups (A?B, p < 0.001, A?C: p = 0.009; B?C, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: There were no significant differences among the three groups in binocular distant UCVA, and groups B and C showed better intermediate UCVAs than group A. Near UCVA was ranked in the order of groups A, C, B.
KEYWORD
Bifocal, Extended depth of focus, Multifocal intraocular lens, Visual acuity
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø